The Vice Presidential Debate: Man in the Street Answers

Meet Joe Biden.
Suppose you were stopped in the street and asked the same questions that Senator Biden and Governor Palin had to answer last night. How would you answer? Would you be smooth and coherent or so rickety you would be told to be on your way? I wondered how I would answer the questions so I found a transcript of the debate and copied the questions into a file, leaving a space between each question. I printed the file and then quickly wrote my response to each question, kind of simulating being asked the questions in real-time. Here are my answers. Remember, I answered them quickly without benefit of thought or research, so go easy on me. If you wish, answer some of them yourself in the comments. I’ve edited the questions for brevity and relevancy.

1. The Senate passed a big bailout bill and the House is wrestling with it still tonight. Is this the worst of Washington or the best of Washington that we saw play out?

This is the worst of Washington. They even added $150-billion in side-issue tax measures. Those who voted this measure in should be voted out.

2. If you were vice president, would you work to shrink this gap of polarization which has sprung up in Washington?

Just treat those who you meet with respect and value their point of view. Give credit to the opposing party where it is due.

3. Who do you think was at fault in the sub-prime lending meltdown? Was it the greedy lenders? Was it the risky home-buyers who shouldn’t have been buying a home in the first place? And what should you be doing about it?

If you want to be greedy in your lending that is your affair. If you want to take a risk and buy more home than you can afford that is your prerogative. Once you get a taxpayer funded bailout then that’s everyone’s business. Lenders, borrowers, and government are all to blame. But especially government for adding billions of dollars in debt with a foolhardy bailout.
Sarah Palin
4. Is proposing to raise taxes on people who earn over $250,000 a year not class warfare? A proposal to tax employer health benefits which some studies say would actually throw five million more people onto the roles of the uninsured. I want to know why that isn’t taking things out on the poor.

One of the best ways to tax is by everyone paying the same percentage of their income, if you must tax income. That way the poorest to the richest pay towards running their country. This is also not the time to tax health benefits.

5. What promises have you made that you’re not going to be able to keep?

I suspect there will always be promises that politicians won’t be able to keep. As for myself, I rarely make promises so there are precious few to break.

6. Last year, Congress passed a bill that would make it more difficult for debt-strapped mortgage-holders to declare bankruptcy, to get out from under that debt. Would you have supported this?

Yes. It should be difficult to declare bankruptcy. Debt should be paid off, even if it takes a long time.

7. What is true and what is false about what we have heard, read, discussed, debated about the causes of climate change?

As in the past the earth’s climate is changing today. This is probably due to natural climatic changes. More research is needed to establish if there is a man-made component.

8. Do you support caps on carbon emissions? Do you support clean coal technology?

I don’t support either. Coal should be used until there is a better domestic substitute.

9. Do you support, as they do in Alaska, granting same-sex benefits to couples?


10. Would you support expanding that beyond Alaska to the rest of the nation?


11. What is a clear plan for an exit strategy in Iraq?

An exit can begin immediately. Financial resources need to be conserved. We can no longer afford to be an army of occupation.

12. What’s the greater threat, a nuclear Iran or an unstable Afghanistan? Explain why.

Afghanistan should be left to itself. It hasn’t the resources to be a threat and any army of occupation will eventually grow weary and have to withdraw. Iran is more of a threat because of future nuclear capability. However, with the United States out of Iraq and Afghanistan the U.S. becomes a viable check against Iran.

13. Secretaries of state Baker, Kissinger, Powell, they have all advocated some level of engagement with enemies. Do you think these former secretaries of state are wrong on that?

You don’t need to talk to enemies, just defend against any malfeasance they try to inflict.

14. What has this administration done right or wrong — this is the great, lingering, unresolved issue, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict — what have they done? And is a two-state solution the solution?

This administration has done no worse than prior administrations. Two separate states is the solution.

15. Interventionism, nuclear weapons, what should be the trigger, or should there be a trigger, when nuclear weapons use is ever put into play?

Each situation is different. In wartime, the use of nuclear weapons should be an option.

16. How would a Biden administration be different from an Obama administration?

It would be different, just as a Palin administration would be different from a McCain administration. Reviewing their passions and voting and governing records would give some clues as to their direction.

17. What do you think the vice presidency is worth now?

The vice president is the first in the presidential line of succession. The vice president is also the President of the Senate. Support of personal charities and good causes could be promoted.

18. Do you believe as Vice President Cheney does, that the Executive Branch does not hold complete sway over the office of the vice presidency, that it it is also a member of the Legislative Branch?


19. Gov. Palin’s Achilles heel is that you she lacks experience. Sen. Biden’s Achilles heel is that he lacks discipline. What do you think it really is?

After listening to both candidates I think they would both make fine vice presidents and even presidents.

20. Can you think of a single policy issue in which you were forced to change a long-held view in order to accommodate changed circumstances?

I would think that some views would have to be changed depending upon circumstances.
Rickety signature.

Stimulus or Bailout: Is There any Difference?

From the steps of the Federal Hall National Memorial is visible J. P. Morgan & Co. Building (left) and the New York Stock Exchange (right).
Debate continues in Congress on the proposed $700 billion bank bailout. The rickety stock market slumped again as investors awaited the outcome of the Senate bank rescue hearing. One informal internet poll with 143,046 respondents had 52% rejecting the whole plan. People are just not happy that the “fat cats” will be getting free money. Here are some comments from around the internet. I could find precious few that were in favor of the bailout:

  • “I don’t see any reason to give Henry Paulson $700 billion in taxpayer money.”
  • “With this bailout, Paulson has effectively legitimized financial fraud.”
  • “Let the chips land where they may.”
  • “I knew I should have just overspent like everyone else and then let someone else pay for it.”
  • “Write your local congressmen an email… say ‘NO!'”
  • “I just don’t get it. Why can’t we just let some of these companies fail?”
  • “We should let Wall Street crash and burn just the way ordinary Americans and small businesses have been treated.”

Now recall the stimulus checks where most of us received $600 from the government. Was there a great outcry against the borrowing of $152 billion to finance this election year bribe? Not that I can recall. All I could muster was, “I cannot think of a more stupider plan!” Except perhaps for a second round of stimulus checks. How totally silly, such incredulous bogosity. But I still put my $600 in the bank and said, “Thank you very much, Sir.”

Now consider if the rest of you, unlike me, had protested strenuously to your elected officials that you wanted no such stimulating. You would have explained to them the foolishness of borrowing billions only to have to pay every last $600 back with interest. Do you think that Congress then would even dare to debate $700 billion for bankers? Well, maybe they still would have.

Seems to me that one of the most prevalent comments is the best solution of all. Come November, “just vote the bums out.”
Rickety signature.